Two Faces of Power
We have seen countries
around the world going to wars because of power. Power decides who controls
what and who. What happens if the controlled do not want to be controlled?
If power is properly distributed and there is no abuse of power then a
society cannot have that arise from mismanagement of power.
In the article “Two
Faces of Power” Peter Bachrachand and Morton S. Baratz the multiple faces of
power. The authors discuss that sociologists, scholars, and political
scientists share different views of power distribution. While most sociologists
believe that power is very centralized, scholars and other people argue that
power is widely spread. In this paper Bachrachand and Baratz are arguing that
power has two faces. In a simple example, the two authors point out that
sometimes people just look that is ruling and making decisions but they do not
look at the source of the power.
We can cite the
revolutions that having taking place in the Arab world as a great example of
this scenario. Their leaders became so powerful such that they thought they
were irreplaceable and they were ruling with absolute authority. However, once
people got tired the started uprising in order to change their society. In this
case we see also that ordinary people are the source of power and they can
change power holders to their favor. Bachrachand and Baratz finish the argument
by saying that people need to study power without taking sides and they propose
that a new model for studying power be developed. In this model researchers and
scholars have to be neutral.